The Saga of SaragarhiJEYAGANESH GOPALSAMY
Throughout the travails of time, men have been inspired by countless tales of bravery, intrepidity and chivalry. None evokes such raw rush of emotions as the story of men defending their post against daunting odds both in terms of numbers of the enemy and the certainty of paying the ultimate price.
The annals of military history, witnessing famous battles fought on an epic scale by a small group of fearless men, punctuates its chapters from the Battle of Thermopylae 480 BC when Sparta under King Leonidas put up a stubborn resistance against the onslaught of the Persians on the narrow isthmus, to Battle of Thakur Ghar in 2002, when US Special Operation Forces were cut off and surrounded yet fought a pitched battle with Taliban fighters occupying higher ground.
The Thermopylae legend has it that 300 Spartans faced almost 60,000 Persians. 20,000 Macedonians under Alexander faced 100,000 Persians in the Battle of Guagmela.
70 French Foreign Legionnaires under Captain Jean Danjou made their last stand in The Battle of Cameroon against 2,000 Mexicans. The Battle of Alamo, Bastogne, Pasir Panjang, Chosin Reservoir, Tra Binh Dong and countless others have one thing in common; all tell the tales of collective bravery and devotion to duty against an otherwise, hopeless situation.
In terms of ratio on the odds faced in such a dire situation, none come closer to those faced by 21 formidable soldiers of the 36th Sikh of West Bengal Infantry (present day 4th Sikh Regiment) on a hot summer morning in Saragarhi, North Western Frontier Province (NWFP - present day Pakistan) on September 12, 1897.
These 21 Sikh soldiers were up against the ferocious Afridi and Orakzai tribes of the Pashtun, numbering close to 10,000. The staggering ratio of 1: 416 stacked against the Sikhs was both unmatched and unprecedented, making their "last stand" at Saragarhi as the greatest odds faced by any troops in the history of warfare.
The odds faced by the Sikhs of 1 against 416 Pathans will make the Battle Of Thermopylae made famous by the Hollywood flick "300" a child's play.
Saragarhi was a communication relay post between Fort Lockhart and Fort Gulistan in the Sulaiman Range of NWFP. Since Lockhart and Gulitsan were not in a visual line of sight due to geographical attributes, a midway heliograph communication post was built at Saragarhi.
Heliography is a communication technique used by capturing sunlight with a mirror and transmitting it via coded messages. Therefore, the Saragarhi post was vital in ensuring the survival of these two Forts in specific and the defence of the region, in general.
The last decades of the 19th century were indeed a trying time for the British Empire in India, the crown jewel of its empire. The Russians were trying to make inroads into the continent via Afghanistan and the British made several incursions into Afghanistan to stop this adventurism by the tribes allied to Russia. In order to contain and keep the tribes in check, the British manned a series of posts along the Hindu Kush ranges.
These posts were constructed by the great Sikh Emperor, Maharaja Ranjit Singh, during his Western campaign. After the decline of the Sikh empire, these were taken over by the British for the same purpose. Constant raids and skirmishes by these violent and bloodthirsty tribesmen were a regular occurrence and the British Indian Army was in constant vigil.
Atrocities against captured soldiers by the Pashtun or Afghani tribesmen were rampant. Castration, mutilation and skinning captured soldiers alive was one of the many ways tribal leaders instilled fear and control. The Pasthun were fierce warriors just like the Sikhs and Gurkhas of the British Indian Army but lacked the chivalry aspect of the warrior ethos.
The type of war the British soldiers and Indian sepoys fought in Afghan and NWFP was aptly described by Rudyard Kipling in his poem "The Young British Soldier":
When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
The relationship between the Sikh soldiers and the British Army started out of mutual admiration for each others' courage and tenacity in the battle during the First Anglo-Sikh War (1839-45) and the Second Anglo-Sikh War (1845-49). The inception of Sikh soldiers, their former nemesis into the British Indian Army, was a testament to that admiration.
Soldering in Sikhism has a strong religious underpinning to it, akin to the Samurai warrior's Code of Bushido. Sikhism emphasizes in defending the faith, protecting the weak, devotion to duty without fear or favour. These are some of the hallmarks of the Sikh religion and its members hold true to these tenets.
It is no wonder that the Herculean task which fell on these 21 Sikhs on that fateful day, would test their soldering skills, bravery, devotion and endurance to their limit.
Prior to September 12, numerous attempts were made by the Pathans to overrun the post but they failed due to calculated defensive actions by the Sikhs under the able leadership of Havildar Ishar Singh, the detachment commander at Saragarhi. Unbeknownst to him, the Pathans were planning a major offensive to decimate this vital post and the D-day was set for September 12, 1897, the H-hour at 0900 hrs.
The Pathan strategy called for the time-proven hammer and anvil maneuver, which is to block the reinforcement from Fort Lockhart (anvil) and strike Saragarhi with impunity (hammer). The chess pieces were in place and it was time for the Pathans to make the first move.
Havildar Ishar Singh peered through his binoculars from the watch tower of his post. What he saw numbed him, briefly. Through the magnified view, he could see columns upon columns and row upon rows of Pathans waving their swords and guns menacingly at the Sikhs. The dust kicked up by the thousands of horses temporarily blocked the sun rising over the horizon. The Pathan forces assembled before the Sikhs were colossal and raring to go.
Sepoy Gurmukh Singh, the detachment signaller, went up an elevated mound to set up his heliograph and began signalling to Fort Lockhart about their predicament: "ENEMY APPROACHING THE MAIN GATE ... NEED REINFORCEMENT".
Lt Col Haughton, Commanding Officer of 36th Sikh Battalion, rushed his troops to augment the outnumbered Sikhs but to no avail. The Pathans had systematically cut-off the supply route between Fort Lockhart and Saragarhi, a tactic to slowly strangle the Sikhs into submission.
Fort Lockhart transmitted back: "UNABLE TO BREAKTHRU ... HOLD POSITION".
Saragarhi flashed back: "UNDERSTOOD".
With that message, Lt Col Haughton had sealed the faith of the Sikhs at Saragarhi to certain death. As he watched from Fort Lockhart, Haugthon counted at least 10 enemy standards (each representing 1,000 tribesmen) facing the 21 Sikh soldiers.
Sepoy Gurmukh Singh passed on this message to Havildar Ishar Singh. As he assessed the grim situation facing him and his men, the Pathans began their attack.
Like wild hordes on the loose, the Pathans howling at top of their voices rode with guns blazing onto the Sikhs in order to breach the main gate of the post. One of the sepoys sounded the bugle as per Havildar Ishar Singh's command (signals during battle in the 18th and 19th centuries were via through bugle) and in a flash they formed up two lines abreast, one row in a squatting firing position and the other standing, as per the bugle's tone.
The Martini Henry breech loading rifle, the standard British Infantry rifle, was put through its paces.
Martini Henry rifles first entered service with the British Army in 1871 and quickly became its mainstay. Colonial units such as the Sikhs and Gurkhas only received them after all the British units were equipped .
It had only been a few months since these frontier regiments were equipped with these rifles, replacing the venerable Enfield. Capable of firing ten .303 calibre rounds a minute, it proved to be more than a match to the antiquated muzzle loading rifles possessed by the tribesmen.
Havildar Ishar Singh's piercing eyes stared at the group of tribal leaders ordering him to lay down his arms and surrender. A devout Sikh and fatherly figure to his unit, the troops under his command knew full well the ability of this North Western Frontier veteran.
Havildar Ishar Singh understood this terrain very well, its unpredictable climate and above all the character and fighting ability of the blood thirsty Pathan warriors.
The effective range of the Henry Martini rifle was around 600 yards (550m). Havildar Ishar Singh held his order to fire until the enemy closed in within 250m from his post.
Once the Pathans breached this marker, he yelled: "NA DARON AR SON JAB JAI LARON" ... in chorus with the soldiers: "NISCHEY KAR APNI JEEET KARON" ...
And then: "FIRE ... RELOAD ... FIRE AT WILL ..."
The .303 calibre was deadly and effective at this range, coupled with the grouping shots formed by the line abreast formations. The first line of the Pathan advance was completely decimated.
However, there was no time to reflect upon their success. With manual breech loading, the rifle had to be cocked every time to shoot. This was time consuming.
Furthermore, the Pathans who fell in the first wave were only part of the advance party that was sent to recon the Sikhs strength. From atop the post, Havildar Ishar Singh saw again thousands of Pathans in rows upon rows, waiting to charge against their beleaguered position. Now the Pathans knew the actual strength of the Sikhs and planned for a massive assault on all flanks, a multi-pronged attack designed to divide the outnumbered Sikhs into much smaller groups thereby ensuring weaker defensive formations.
The attack this time was with such fury that the earth around the fort shook as the Pathan horsemen thundered across the barren land to slice the Sikhs into pieces. Havildar Ishar Singh, unnerved by this onslaught, gave battle orders again: "SQUATTING SOLDIERS TO THE RIGHT ... STANDING SOLDIERS TO THE LEFT ... QUICKLY ... QUICKLY...", with clarity amid the chaos of battle.
The highly disciplined soldiers followed the orders like clock-work. The tribesmen attacked in two formations, one towards the main gate and the other towards the gap at the fort.
Havildar Ishar Singh calculated that at least 150 tribesmen rode in this wave. He could see only the white of their eyes as the tribesmen approached closer, masking their faces. Undeterred, he yelled their regiment battle cry together with his troops ... "JO BOLE SO NIHAL ... SAT SRI AKAL!"... and as the tribesmen came within range: "FIRE". The sounds of .303 exiting the barrels was deafening.
The tribesmen's attack was repulsed once again by the Sikhs due to superior marksmanship and motivation. Some tribesmen lay dead just yards away from the Sikh position denoting fighting at close quarters. The soldiers' ranks and ammunitions also started to dwindle at this juncture.
Out of the full strength of 21 soldiers at the start of the hostilities around 0900 hrs, by 1200, they were now down to 10, with the ever inspiring Havildar Ishar Singh still leading the men, despite being gravely injured by bullets and saber slashes. By this time, the Sikhs had repulsed seven charges by the tribesmen.
As the battle raged on without any respite, the ammunition gradually depleted and by 1400 hrs, Sepoy Gurumukh Singh signalled Fort Lockhart Battalion HQ: "LOW ON AMMO ... NEED AMMO ... URGENTLY!".
The heliograph had done its part in conveying the message. Lt Col Haughton sent his personal orderly to try and pass the ammunition to the trapped Sikhs, but again to no avail.
As the Pathans attacked again, the Sikhs, with less than 10 able bodied men, put up a stiff resistance and managed to repel the attack yet once again, but only briefly. The tribesmen now resorted to their traditional tactics - they set fire to the bushes and scrubs around Fort Saragarhi in a desperate attempt to subdue the Sikhs. Clouds of smoke blanketed the fort, making it impossible for the Sikhs to see the enemy.
Taking this opportunity and knowing full well that a frontal attack against the Sikhs was suicidal, the tribesmen used the smoke to mask their approach to the breach at the wall. Officers and soldiers at the Battalion HQ in Fort Lockhart could clearly see the approach of the tribesmen due to their elevated position above Saragarhi. Lt Col Haugton frantically signalled Saragarhi: "ENEMY APPROCHING THE BREACH ...!"
Havildar Ishar Singh, due to injuries sustained, had to drag himself towards the breach, accompanied by two other sepoys, to stop the tribesmen from entering the fort. Out of ammunition, all three of them fixed their bayonets and charged the tribesmen.
Overwhelmed by the sheer numbers facing them, all three fell were they stood, Havildar Ishar Singh providing leadership until the end. At the same time, the tribesmen entered the main gate due to the thinning of the defensive lines as a result of mounting casualties.
The main gate had been breached. However, hand to hand fighting still took place inside the fort, in full view from Fort Lockhart. Lt Col Haugton clenched his fist in frustration as there was nothing he could do to help the Sikhs.
Only 4 Sikhs were alive by the time the tribesmen breached the fort, with an additional sepoy, Gurumukh Singh, in the nearby mound providing up to date situation report via heliograph.
Out of ammunition, they did not lay down their weapons; instead, they formed an all round defensive position with their backs against each other, their bayonets pointing outwards.
The onslaught of the tribesmen soon reached its feverish peak: a force of nearly a hundred converged on the fort and hacked the valiant Sikhs into pieces, but not before the Sikhs took a few heads with them. From Lockhart, soldiers were in utter disbelief of the raw courage displayed down below at Saragarhi and the stiff resistance put up by the remaining Sikhs. They simply gasped in awe of the action unfolding before their very eyes.
At 1530 hrs Sep Sepoy Gurumukh Singh transmitted: "MAIN GATE BREACHED ... DOWN TO ONE ... REQUEST PERMISSION TO DISMOUNT AND JOIN THE FIGHT ...!"
Orders came back: "PERMISSION GRANTED!"
Sepoy Gurumukh Singh disassembled his heliograph device, picked up his rifle and went into the fort to join the fight. With exceptional presence of mind, courage and incredible tenacity, Sepoy Gurumukh joined in the fray.
Soldiers at Fort Lockhart saw him disappear into the thick of the battle, right into the tribesmen line. They could only hear him shouting at the top of his voice: "JO BOLE SO NIHAL ... SAT SRI AKAL! ... JO BOLE SO NIHAL, SAT SRI AKAL...!"
The third battle cry grew even more weaker, whilst Gurmukh Singh began choking on his blood as he stood there, bayoneting. Legend has it that he took down single-handedly 20 tribesmen before succumbing to the repeated slashes of the tribesmen's swords and the fire that was engulfing the post.
Sepoy Gurumukh Singh, the youngest of the group, was no more than 19 years old and the last to fall. He lay down with blood oozing from his wounds as crimson as the sun setting over the horizon.
Twitching, as his last breath left him, Sepoy Gurumukh Singh could hear in the deep recesses of his mind the melodic hymn of "DUKH BHANJAN" his mother had recited every evening in their home. He died, satisfied in the knowledge that he had done his duty!
LT Col Haughton signaled his HQ in Punjab about the battle that had transpired. Within a few hours, tales of their bravery were making news across India.
The Governor General of India, the Earl of Elgin, wrote a personal telegraph to Queen Victoria describing the bravery of the Sikhs soldiers defending the post till their death.
The news reached the British House of Commons, and the tales of sacrifice of the 21 Sikh soldiers were narrated; tears flowed freely in the August house. At the end the of Chief Whip's speech, the entire parliament gave a rousing standing ovation to the Gallant 21, as their names were called out aloud in a symbolic roll call.
The collective courage of the 21 Sikh soldiers moved Queen Victoria so much that Her Majesty decreed that due to conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity beyond and above the call of duty displayed by the 21 soldiers, all of them shall be awarded the Indian Order Merit (IOM) posthumously. The IOM was the highest award for bravery given to colonial troops and it was equivalent to the British Victoria Cross.
This was the only time in history of warfare where each soldier who took part in the same battle was given the highest award. Additionally, Her Majesty decreed that the net of kin of these brave soldiers would each be given a stipend of 500 rupees and 50 acres of land.
Finally, a memorial cenotaph was to be erected near the place where all these 21 soldiers fell, as a perpetual record to the heroic action of these gallant soldiers who died at their posts in the defence of Fort Saragarhi, on September 12, 1897.
Without the stiff resistance of the 21 Sikh soldiers at Saragarhi, both Fort Lockhart and Gulistan would have fallen to the enemy. By defending their position long enough for the relief column to arrive with artillery support, the 21 Sikh soldiers became the crucial factor in turning the tide of battle in their favour.
The 21 Sikh soldiers fought on continuously for 7 punishing hours without food and water, completely surrounded, and pounded from all flanks. Unwearied by constant charges and mortal danger, they stood their ground against daunting odds, they repealed wave after wave of attack and fought till their last bullets. Even when out of ammunition, they did not abandon their post and instead chose to engage in a fatal hand to hand combat, till all made the ultimate sacrifice.
When the relief column arrived a day later, they saw the burnt out bodies of all the 21 Sikh soldiers, together with at least 600 dead bodies of the tribesmen strewn only yards in front of their position.
The Sikhs had faced 10,000 and had taken more than 600 of the enemy with them.
September 12 henceforth officially became the regimental day of the Sikh Regiment.
Gurdwara Saragarhi was built in Ferozepur as a remembrance to the 21 brave souls. Their names are forever etched on marble at the gurdwara.
It is unfortunate that most Sikhs today - as well as most Indians and Britons - do not know the significance of the Battle of Saragarhi. In France, school children study Saragarhi as part of their curriculum, as an example of devotion to duty and the sacrifices.
UNESCO has listed the Battle of Saragarhi as one of the 6 greatest tales of collective bravery.
By conducting extensive research on this battle, I was able to understand the gargantuan task that befell these soldiers, the grit, determination and indomitable fighting spirit of the gallant 21 during the battle. It is my sincere hope that on every September 12, gurdwaras everywhere will commemorate these brave souls.
The Battle of Saragarhi will forever be remembered, not for the battle itself, but for the 21 soldiers who stood against unmatched odds in military history. They, at the call of duty, rose to the occasion, met the challenge and triumphed even in defeat, despite paying the ultimate price.
Their action on that fateful day is a tough act to follow: they have set a very high standard for gallantry. The 21 soldiers gloriously maintained the reputation of the Sikhs for unflinching courage on the field of battle till their last breath, keeping up with the finest tradition of the Sikh Regiment.
ROLL CALL - A Salute to the Brave
165 Havildar Ishar Singh
332 Naik Lal Singh
834 Sepoy Narayan Singh
546 Lance Naik Chanda Singh
814 Sepoy Gurmukh Singh
1321 Sepoy Sundar Singh
871 Sepoy Jivan Singh
287 Sepoy Ram Singh
1733 Sepoy Gurmukh Singh
492 Sepoy Uttar Singh
163 Sepoy Ram Singh
182 Sepoy Sahib Singh
1257 Sepoy Bhagwan Singh
359 Sepoy Hira Singh
1265 Sepoy Bhagwan Singh
687 Sepoy Daya Singh
1556 Sepoy Buta Singh
760 Sepoy Jivan Singh
1651 Sepoy Jivan Singh
791 Sepoy Bhola Singh
1221 Sepoy Nand Singh
PLEASE GET INVOLVED IN THE SARAGARHI DAY CAMPAIGN BY CLICKING HERE.
First published: September 3, 2009
Re-published: September 11, 2012
Conversation about this article
1: Harbans Lal (Arlington, Texas, U.S.A.), September 03, 2009, 11:54 AM.
Thank you, Jeyaganesh ji, for this excellent commentary on the extraordinary happenings of September 12, 1897. The Sikh heroes were fighting against terrorism of the time then, over a century ago. Now that we will be soon commemorating 9/11, we need to be reminded that Sikhs continue to uphold their tradition of sacrifices for the human rights of all, and serving others. The first doctor who reached the attack site to treat the 9/11 victims was a Sikh, the first person arrested on mistaken identity in post-9/11 U.S.A. was a Sikh, and the first American to be killed in a hate crime in post-9/11 America attack was a Sikh. Next week, Sikhs will be joining all other Americans to hold Unity Day gatherings to accept the challenge that it is not hate but unity that will ensure peace.
2: Ajitpal Singh (Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.), September 03, 2009, 6:42 PM.
I wonder if some reputable Hollywood director, say like Ridley Scott, would ever consider making a movie on this battle. So this message of incredible valour and loyalty could reach the wider audience, as it rightly deserves.
3: Gurjender Singh (Maryland, U.S.A.), September 03, 2009, 7:58 PM.
Sikh solders sacrificed their lives for the freedom for others around the world. But unfortunately, Indian leaders and the countries that benefitted from their sacrifices quickly forgot them because they belonged to a miniroty. Recently I read that Bollywood has become cognizant of these sacrifices of the 21 Sikh soldiers and is making a movie about Battle of Saragarhi to honour them.
4: Satvir Kaur (Boston, U.S.A.), September 04, 2009, 9:10 AM.
Reading the details of the Battle of Saragarhi always brings tears to my eyes. And I pray to the Lord for a fraction of this courage. Thanks for describing it so brilliantly.
5: N. Singh (Canada), September 07, 2009, 3:31 PM.
Thank you for this story! When I was growing up in the U.K., we were constantly given history lessons in how the Brits had won the first and second World Wars. No mention was every made of the Sikh contribution. As a consequence, I never knew of our rich and brave history and how the Sikhs had contributed to making this world a better and safe place to live in. I was also disappointed when I saw the film "300" glorifying the historical effort of the Spartans because deep down in my heart I knew that the Sikhs had done better in history, fought harder and overcome great odds but I didn't know the facts to prove it. Now I know! We should not wait for Hollywood or Bollywood to make these movies ... we need to start making our own movies, nurturing and encouraging our own talent. We need to start telling our own stories otherwise the Indian establishment will tell it for us ... at our expense!
6: Feryal Ali Gauhar (Lahore, Pakistan), September 08, 2009, 1:00 AM.
I have read the very moving account of the last stand of the 21 Sikh soldiers at the Fort of Saragarhi. While I am deeply impressed by the valour and discipline of the soldiers who protected the fort against all odds, I am equally concerned about the fact that an important aspect of the story has gone completely unmentioned: that the Sikh soldiers defending the fort were doing so on the Orders of the British Empire, a colonial power which pitted Hindu and Muslim and Sikh against each other, and that, even more ironically, the "blood-thirsty Pathans" were actually defending a homeland which had been colonized by the outsider. I think it is extremely important for all of us from the subcontinent to recognize the divisive powers of colonialism, and that Sikh bravery has been matched by the bravery of non-sikhs when it was a question of defending the homeland. I just wish that the British Empire had not divided us to the extent that we now see each other through the prism that was created through the colonial experience: seeing each other as the enemy, instead of seeing colonization as the enemy. The Pathans have as much a right to defend their homeland from colonization as do any other people anywhere else. That they refused to join the colonial forces is a mark of their courage, which has been totally denied in an otherwise well-told story. By the way, how did the writer know what the dying soldiers where thinking/seeing/hearing when no one lived to tell the tale? Creative liscence?
7: Balraj Singh (Kanpur, India), September 08, 2009, 8:49 AM.
I am sorry, but the Pathans weren't defending their territory when they raided Punjab over and over again, every few years over the course of centuries, raping and pillaging, brutalizing and plundering like no one ever had done before or since! Thank God for the Sikhs, who are the only ones who have ever been able to conquer the Pathans ... otherwise, the free-for-all would have continued!
8: Roopinder Singh Bains (Surrey, British Columbia, Canada), September 08, 2009, 7:32 PM.
Well said, Balraj Singh. The invaders from Afghanistan for centuries took women and wealth from Punjab and Hindustan - the mountains dividing Afghanistan from "hindustan" are called the Hindu Kush mountains which means 'hindu killers', since no Hindu had ever crossed this range. It was only the Sikhs who dared to cross them and stop the invasions by pushing them back deep into Afghanistan. How many in present-day 'hindustan' and in the Sikh community know this?
9: James (Australia), September 09, 2009, 2:55 PM.
I am told that a movie has been made ... '21 Battle of Saragarhi' ... but I cannot find it. Can anyone help please?
10: Gursharan Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), September 13, 2009, 7:02 AM.
Bollywood producers should make a movie on this and not let Hollywood do it. Remember Bhagat Singh - at least three movies were made on him. Bollywood has the resources to do the job.
11: Sukhcharan Singh Grewal (Norway), September 16, 2009, 5:39 AM.
I thank Feryal Ali Gauhar for his comments. I believe people all over the world are same, call them brave, cruel or otherwise. It is one individual, known as their leader, who has the talent (a gift of leadership) of using people as a resource for his purpose. The British used a variety of Indian communities to subdue the Sikhs, and probably the Tamils to subdue Tipu Sultan. And recently, V. Prabhakaran of LTTE, converted frail looking girls to do great acts of 'courage', like sucide bombings. Had he got a seperate homeland for the Tamils, there would have been no democracy, but Prabhakaran's rule: kill any one who opposes him. General Custer of U.S.A. also made a similar stand at Little Big Horn in 1876. He was both a hero to the Whites and a villian to the First Nations. The aim was to control Black Hills for gold mining, which was rightfully Sioux territory. It is wrong to label any group of people as cruel; those are the deeds of the leader(s) who do(es) the planning: the people are just followers. Generation of hate for the enemy is one weapon these leaders use. It gets their men together who thereafter attack the chosen enemy, even on their own, without any allocation of fighting resources. We are just one people of this world. A raw material to a leader, who will continue to use us for his purposes. Lastly, education and freedom of expression (to get everything out of your system) will ultimately get humanity into a real world. Whether we are Afghans, Sikhs or any other, we all have our families who need to have their world filled with happiness and peace.
12: Col.l(Retd) K.J.S. Sandhu (Hyderabad, India), September 17, 2009, 4:11 AM.
Honour, Duty, Courage, Battle, Life and Death: Difficult and different words and values in the 21 Century, with its materialistic ethos. Personal selfish needs and motives dominate. My salute to those gallant 21 of Saragarhi who came so close to Guru Gobind Singh's battle cry of "Savaa lakh se ek ladaaon ... : The fine Sikh Regiment, 4 SIKH in particular, is a rarity in the annals of military history. This Battalion was mistakenly given a poor record for its defensive battle in Ladakh in 1962 against the Chinese aggression. Decades later, after the thaw in Indo-Chinese relations and thestart of peace talks, the PLA (Chinese Army) handed over documents and pictures of the outstanding bravery and tenacity of 4 SIKH during 1962. This Battalion's history, I am told, was rewritten to straighten the record based on the enemy's (Chinese) account of their bravery while facing Chinese human-wave tactics of attack. I hope and pray that future Sikh generations draw inspiration from this saga of heroism and keep the spirit and spark alive. God bless these brave soldiers.
13: Dilsher SIngh Gill (Farmington Hills, MI, U.S.A.), September 17, 2009, 9:50 PM.
Bravery, valor, sacrifice, pride and the traditions of Sikhs are unmatched in the annals of history, irrespective of the situation, period and the cause for which these brave men had sacrificed their lives. I don't think we should confuse this aspect of this great race with the politics of the situation or the social and cultural metaphors of time.
14: Paramjit Singh (Shaker Heights, Ohio, U.S.A.), September 19, 2009, 12:17 PM.
Sikhism has so much to offer and share with the world ... it is high time that we as Sikhs take some time out of the Gurdwara and pro-actively participate with the non-Sikh population. The concept of Langar should not be limited to the Gurdwaras. Let's take it out to where the poor and hungry can be nourished by it. Guru Nanak went as far as Turkey to share his message to make it a better world! Remember, it is never too late ...
15: Kuldip Hara (Cerritos, U.S.A.), September 21, 2009, 1:07 AM.
I believe that the middle names of 'Singh' and 'Kaur' bestowed upon us aptly distinguish us from the rest. Just like the Lion is the King of the Jungle, so are the Singhs and Kaurs Kings and Queens in this world. Thanks for sharing this story of extraordinary bravery with the world.
16: Anita Dhall (India), October 02, 2009, 3:32 AM.
To read about Sikh History adds extra pride - being a direct descendant of General Hari Singh Nalwa (Gujranwala) and having some historic memorabilia passed on to me, I know we are a very valiant and fair race. I shall pass a link to this article on to our cousins, and I am sure they will enjoy reading this piece of history. My cousin Dr. Vanit Nalwa has recently published a book on our famous ancestor. Thank you for sharing your story.
17: Roopinder Singh Bains (Surrey, British Columbia, Canada), October 02, 2009, 11:37 PM.
Great book on Hari Singh Nalwa. Young children in Afghanistan are frightened by their mothers who say in Pashtu: "Beware, Nalwa is coming!"
18: Jasjit Singh (London, United Kingdom), September 11, 2012, 11:21 AM.
What a wonderfully researched and written article, made even more endearing by the fact that it is written by a non-Sikh. I remember being in the audience as a young student when a spellbinding lecture on this topic was delivered by Lord Slim as part of the Anglo Sikh Heritage Trail's annual "Portraits of Courage" lecture. I left with a feeling of immense pride and was energized beyond description. We must keep this battle in the public consciousness. It is a test of the value we place on our heritage and the blood of martyrs.
19: Ari Singh (Sofia, Bulgaria), September 11, 2012, 1:04 PM.
Well researched article. I doubt if Bollywood will make a movie on Saragarhi as the Khans rule Bollywood! There is no actor who will dare stand up against the Khans. Ironically, the nucleus of terrorism is still located in the same area.
20: Hardeep Gill (United Kingdom), September 11, 2012, 1:33 PM.
Great article. Does anyone have any detailed info on the UNESCO designation?
21: Arran Singh (United Kingdom), September 11, 2012, 2:02 PM.
In response to Hardeep Singh's query, I believe ASHT and/or Nishaan may have some more information.
22: Morrissey (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), September 11, 2012, 3:30 PM.
A clarification: the Saraghari Gurdwara is actually situated near Darbar Sahib in old Amritsar. A small little set-up, blink your eye and you'll miss it.
23: Navjot Singh (England), September 11, 2012, 4:03 PM.
The Anglo-Sikh Heritage Trail (ASHT) is close to completing an iconic documentary on the battle, including interviews with key military historians from England and India. Ground breaking research about the battle is brought to light with high definition filming. Can't wait for this epic documentary. I am sure it will form the gold standard for subsequent Sikh documentaries. Keep up the great work!
24: Hardeep Gill (United Kingdom), September 11, 2012, 5:21 PM.
I believe the makers of "Turbanology" and "Sikhs at War" are also releasing documentary or two soon ... the more the merrier!
25: Sangat Singh (Kuala Lumpu, Malaysia), September 12, 2012, 7:38 AM.
The 12th of September every year marks the famous battle, but it is commemorated primarily by the Sikh Regiment. I hope a film is produced to preserve this most significant event.
26: J.K. Kohli (London, United Kingdom), September 14, 2012, 12:48 PM.
I am told that there was TV coverage of the Saragarhi event in the UK. I can't find any reference. Can anyone please confirm.