Kids Corner

Current Events

Manmohan Singh:
The Sardar is King at G20 Summit

by HAROON SIDDIQUI

 

 

Editor's Note: 

Any story on Manmohan Singh in these pages attracts the full gamut of emotions and comments.

Being unequivocally a man of impeccable honesty, integrity and competence - in a nation totally mired in corruption, general and steady decline of its masses, and extreme incomptence at all levels, including its 'leaders' - he receives well-deserved bouquets.  

As a prime minister who sees his role as defined by, and representing, only the best interests of India - and not willing to get involved in Sikh issues, even though he is a Sikh himself - he is prone to, either unwittingly or through political compulsion,  regurgitating the lies, half-truths and obfuscations formulated by the right-wing, extremist and narrow-minded Hindu interests that have a strangle-hold on his government and nation.

We at sikhchic.com present to you this excellent interview by a world-renowned and respected journalist for a number of reasons, including:

To begin, he, Manmohan Singh is for better or worse one of us! As a Sikh - and like evey Sikh - he is an ambassador of our  community, wherever he goes, whatever he does. In many ways, he has done us proud as a man who stands head and shoulders over his peers around the world.

Also, knowing that he is a mouthpiece of a certain anti-Sikh mind-set in India, we need to know exactly what lies are being concocted against us and how and where they are being disseminated. We need to understand all aspects of this difficult situation in order to figure out a solution to the problem.

Turning a blind eye to these realities will not get us anywhere. Not giving these realities any coverage on this, the prime Sikh forum of this kind in the world - as some of our readers would want us to do - will get us nowhere.

In the spirit of providing you a glimpse of what we are up against, we present to you this interview ... with the following anecdote that is often quoted in Washington, D.C. circles and, coincidentally, also encapsules our own predicament as a community. In this story lies a valuable lesson for us, especially vis-a-vis our dealings with Manmohan Singh and others like him.

The story goes that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was approached by a friend and supporter - a black labour leader representing a powerrful nation-wide union of railway porters - for help. During a meeting with the President, the labour leader put up a strong case for the passing of new legislation to correct historical wrongs. As Roosevelt said goodbye to his friend at the door following the latter's presentation, he said: "OK, you've convinced me. Now go out and put pressure on me ... so that I can help you put this thing through."

Sadly, we - the Sikh community - have yet to learn how to put pressure on politicians, even those who are on our side or are one of us, so as to provide them the Archimedean leverage and tools to bring about the necessary change.  

We humbly suggest that we need to ponder on the following question: are Dr. Manmohan Singh's failures vis-a-vis our issues actually our own failures - that is, of the community itself?

It'll be most helpful if comments from readers will focus on this area rather than once again decrying and lamenting Manmohan Singh's failures. 

 

 

AN INTERVIEW BY HAROON SIDDIQUI

The fragile world economy needs more stimulus spending, not cutbacks, India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told the Toronto Star in an exclusive interview.

Wading into the hottest topic of the G20 summit, he sided with Barack Obama against German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Britain's David Cameron, who have both launched cutbacks and austerity programs to control mounting deficits and debts.

Without naming names, Manmohan Singh made it clear where he stands: "My own feeling is that early fiscal retrenchment carries very considerable global risks" of jeopardizing worldwide economic recovery.

"The purpose of G20 should be to ensure that the momentum of recovery is sustained and enhanced in the years to come," he told me.

Manmohan Singh is the only professional economist among the 20 leaders at the summit.

He is the leader of the world's biggest democracy and second largest nation with 1.3 billion people and a $1 trillion economy, about the same as Canada's but growing at about three times the rate and projected to become the world's third largest economy.

I met Dr. Singh, 77, at his residence in this grand and legendary capital of magnificent monuments and red stone buildings from the British Raj, the Mughal Empire and an ancient civilization - a sublime fusion of the East and the West.

He covered a range of topics, besides the G20 - Afghanistan, Pakistan, India's economic and geopolitical clout and its relations with Canada.

He responded readily and directly, in person and in writing, to the many questions I posed him:

  • He complained of "Sikh extremism" in Canada, and charged that Canadian Sikh extremists "have links to or are themselves wedded to terrorism." He said he would be raising the issue with Harper on Sunday, June 27, 2010.

  • He suggested that Canada and other NATO members should not abandon Afghanistan next year. Doing so would "only embolden the radical forces opposed to the emergence of a peaceful, pluralistic and democratic Afghanistan."

  • He praised Canada's "well-governed economy," its "exemplary" banking system and strong financial regulatory regime. That allowed Canada to escape the financial crisis relatively unscathed, just like India. Both can now contribute to the world economic recovery.

Manmohan Singh speaks softly and succinctly. Unlike most politicians who yap and yearn for attention, he's economical with his words and focused in his replies. Modest, he dislikes the limelight.

He did not even seek political office, but was recruited to it.

A Ph.D. from Cambridge, a former professor of economics who served as the secretary-general of the South Commission in Geneva and then as the governor of the Reserve Bank of India, he was named finance minister in 1991 (and concurrently a member of the upper house of parliament).

The free market reforms he introduced are widely credited for unleashing India's economic miracle.

Despite his age and heart surgery, he says "there's no question of my retirement."

He is a Gandhian figure, who, like the great Mahatma, is very much of this world but seemingly unsullied by it.

In a land rife with corruption, Manmohan Singh's honesty is legendary. For decades, he drove himself to work in his beat-up car from his modest house.

Upon becoming prime minister in 2004, he was moved for security reasons to a grand 1930s whitewashed bungalow with high ceilings and wooden floors, sprawling lawns, mature trees, and compound walls.

Known for his punctuality and courtesy, Dr. Singh saw me there, on the dot at the appointed hour, greeting me standing, his folded hands raised in the Indian namaste.

Here's what he said.

Canadian Sikh 'militancy'

A Sikh himself, he has urged Stephen Harper in at least two of his three bilateral meetings to crack down on "Sikh extremists" in Canada.

Such Indian complaints date back to the 1985 Air India bombing which killed all 329 on board, the worst terrorist atrocity in Canadian history.

This being a different era and a different generation of Sikhs, I asked how seriously India perceives the problem of "Sikh extremism" to be in Canada at this time. He replied:

"Sikh extremism, separatism and militancy were a problem in India more than two decades ago. Today, Punjab is at peace and there is growth and prosperity.

"There are, however, some elements outside India, including in Canada, who try to keep this issue alive for their own purposes. In many cases, such elements have links to or are themselves wedded to terrorism.

"Their activities are a reason for both governments - in India and in Canada - to be concerned.

"We have sensitized the Canadian authorities in this matter. We have been pointing out that 'Sikh extremism' in Canada, which has no support in India, is not good for Canada.

"We feel that vigilance and close co-operation between both governments on the issue is necessary."

Some Canadian Sikhs may glorify the "martyrs" of the lost Khalistan separatist cause in the Punjab. But the majority remains estranged from India over India's failure to bring to justice the perpetrators of the 1984 mob attacks on innocent Sikhs in New Delhi in the aftermath of Mrs. Gandhi's assassination by her Sikh bodyguards.

Singh's response:

"It is not correct to say that India has failed to bring the perpetrators of the 1984 attacks on Sikhs in New Delhi to justice. A judicial commission was set up to look into these attacks. Recently, one of the cases was heard  - [25 years after the event!] - in the Delhi Sessions Court on the basis of the charges framed by the Central Bureau of Investigation."

G20 economic woes

Making the case for continued stimulus spending, Manmohan Singh said:

"I think the purpose of G20 should be to reach a broad-based agreement about coordinating macro-economic policy in a manner in which the momentum of recovery can be sustained and enhanced in the years to come, at the same time not giving scope to an inflationary bout which nobody wants.

"But right now, the danger of deflation in the global economy is, in my view, much greater than the danger of inflation."

Asked if he is optimistic or pessimistic, given the Greek bailout and the impending crises in Portugal and Spain, he said:

"Quite honestly, I think the world economy is faced with a number of uncertainties. As it was gradually getting out of the deep depression or deep recession, we've had the Euro-zone crisis and the sovereign debt crisis."

How Europe manages its affairs is "going to be a major determinant of which way the world economy evolves."

Both Canada and India escaped the worst of the economic meltdown because they had strong financial regulatory frameworks. Both oppose the proposed bank levy to pay for future bailouts. Manmohan Singh feels both are well-positioned for the future.

"Canada is a well-governed economy. The Canadian banking system's performance has been exemplary. It has been free of the aberrations of the Anglo-Saxon banking system.

"We (in India) also escaped that sort of calamity. Our banking system was well regulated, remains well regulated. We do not fear for our banking system being vulnerable to that type of crisis.

"Now there's a fear that the Euro-zone and European Union banking system may also be somewhat more vulnerable than envisaged earlier."

While the financial crisis has been caused by the West, sans Canada, countries like India do get affected, he said.

"Therefore, the real challenge before the world is the equitable management of the increased global interdependence of nations. And I think that is the principal task of the G20."

India's economy was galloping at nearly 9 per cent a year, then dipped to 6.7 per cent in 2008-09 but has rebounded since to 8.5 per cent this year and is projected to reach 9 per cent in the years ahead.

"Let me say that India can play its role in the world economy by sustaining the growth momentum . . .

"But we are vulnerable. If the world economy goes into the wrong sort of gear, I think that will create problems for us. Capital flows can be affected. If so, they create their own consequences.

"So, we have a vested interest in an orderly evolution of the global economy.

"We would like the rich countries to sustain a recovery and avoid premature ups and downs of the type which have been experienced since 2008."

Canada-India links

Manmohan Singh and Harper are slated to sign four agreements Sunday - nuclear cooperation, mining, higher education and culture. They are aiming to increase bilateral trade from $5 billion a year to $15 billion. As with China, Harper had a slow start with India but has warmed up to the task (which offers him the partisan side-benefit of wooing Indo-Canadians towards the Conservatives, something he will do Sunday at a gala dinner for Manmohan Singh and the community).

Canada has been slow to catch up on the civilian nuclear bonanza in India. Following the U.S. decision in 2008 to enhance civilian nuclear cooperation with India, New Delhi has done deals with American, French and Russian companies to build nuclear reactors in India.

Canada hopes to sell uranium as well as nuclear technology. There's also talk of Canada and India cooperating in nuclear energy business ventures in Africa and other parts of the world.

Manmohan Singh said: "We regard Canada as an important partner in this endeavour. India has an ambitious program of development of nuclear energy and I see vast opportunities for Indo-Canadian cooperation.

"Given our mutual strengths, we could certainly look at cooperating in other areas of the world."

 

[Courtesy: The Toronto Star. Haroon Siddiqui is the Star's editorial page editor emeritus. 

June 28, 2010

Conversation about this article

1: I.J. Singh (New York, U.S.A.), June 28, 2010, 1:12 PM.

All of us are more complex than even we know ourselves. What moves us is somewhat baffling at times. Manmohan Singh is no different in these matters. True, he is a man of integrity but it stops at the water's edge when it comes to the events of 1984. To say that his government has not neglected the killings of 1984, as he said, is best ingenious; clearly his integrity is first rate in matters of economics and considerably less about 1984. Yet, in some things we Sikhs should celebrate him; in other matters we cannot but rue him. He, too, is a complex man who operates within the myriad limitations and the complex realities of modern day India. There is a lot more gray in us all. I look at Obama and his pre-election promises that seem to be losing ground and changing in the marketplace of real politics. We know not what Manmohan's constraints are, nor do we know the limits of any man's - even Manmohan's - integrity. I don't expect him to look specially to the issues of Sikhs because he is one. I expect him to keep his Sikhi to himself - private - and act as the Prime Minister of a country of many faiths and cultures. And I expect him to do so with total integrity and honesty, and I know that all men fall short. I would expect no differently from a Hindu, Muslim or a Christian Prime Minister, and in some matters likely be equally disappointed. So celebrate him in some matters, villify him in others - reminding him of what is expected of him. And don't forget what remains to be done. So, I welcome the interview.

2: Gurteg Singh (New York, U.S.A.), June 28, 2010, 1:51 PM.

Manmohan Singh told a BIG BOLD FACED LIE on behalf of Indian Government and right wing Hindu extremist propaganda networks when he said: "It is not correct to say that India has failed to bring the perpetrators of the 1984 attacks on Sikhs in New Delhi to justice..." All the ring leaders involved in the massacre are free and roaming around under official protection provided by his Government. Manmohan Singh regularly pays homage at the site of Rajiv Gandhi's memorial- yes, the same man who ordered the genocide of tens of thousands of innocent Sikhs and then dismissed it frivolusly. Manmohan Singh was also sent to the home of the 1984 master-criminal - and Congress leader - H.K.L. Bhagat to pay his respects on the latter's death. It is really a shame that a Sikh Prime Minister made his visit to Canada more about imaginary "Sikh extremists" than about G20 economic issues. In India today, any Sikh who has to be successful has to forget about his Guru's message of standing up for truth and justice and instead act more Hindu than a Hindu to survive. It is really a pathetic and slavish state of affairs.

3: Karam Singh (Kolkata, India), June 28, 2010, 2:05 PM.

I wholeheartedly agree with the message of the Roosevelt story. We are the very same people who did put the pressure on the British Empire in the 1920s to free our Gurdwaras. And it was mainly the Sikhs, not too many other Indians, who effectively put pressure on the Brits to leave India and go home in 1947. Nehru, Gandhi, Patel et al merely road the coat-tails of Sikh activism. But, there are no ifs and buts, "putting pressure" involves a lot of sacrifices, personal and as a community. We need to rejuvenate the spirit of chardi kalaa in ourselves to enable ourselves to do those big things again. Jarnail Singh - the Lion of Delhi - demonstrated so recently that we can do it. He did it all with a shoe - and a ton of guts! Single-handedly, he put pressure on Manmohan Singh and his government! Remember how the quickly the government pulled back the 'ticket' from the 1984 criminals, Tytler and Sajjan? So, gird up your loins, guys and gals! It is time to put pressure! But, first and foremost - let's learn from Jarnail Singh - we must be solid in integrity and commitment, unwavering in our resolve, fearless in our actions ... the Guru will take care of the rest!

4: N. Singh (Canada), June 28, 2010, 5:36 PM.

Firstly, I would like to commend Haroon Siddiqui for not only having the courage and integrity but the intellectual capacity to think through and ask PM Manmohan Singh the 'difficult questions' regarding Nov 1984, instead of just by-passing the issue as most ignorant Canadian journalists are liable to do (... but then, Canada has never been known for its world class education!) I would have however preferred more probing on these issues, and for him not to have just accepted PM Manmohan Singh's answers at face value. I think what would satisfy me to begin with would be for PM Manmohan Singh to have the integrity to sit down with Senior Advocate, Sardar H.S. Phoolka as well as the representatives from Ensaaf and 'Sikhs for Justice' to truly attempt to understand the facts from those who know at the grass roots level what happened and are representing the victims directly. An audience with them would be a gesture of good-will. I am not asking for this because PM Manmohan Singh is a Sikh and therefore should be concerned about Sikhs but because he is the premier of the country and the human rights of its citizens are his direct responsibility. No matter how great an economy he builds, it is but a sham because the basic rights of the minorities are non-existent. It is also his responsibility as a human being, as well as a Sikh (since he self-identifies as one and at his inauguration he pledged by quoting the shabad "Deh Shiva bar mohe ehai", to ensure that the voices of the abused and the sufferers are heard. Otherwise, in my eyes he fails as a man, a Sikh and a leader, no matter how great his economics.

5: Sarabjit Singh (Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.), June 28, 2010, 5:48 PM.

First of all, there is nobody in the world who questionst his honesty and integrity. The first question all Sikhs around the world put to him is over his administration's failure to get justice for 1984 victims of the Delhi pogroms. The second point is: He knew what the Indian agents were doing in Canada; the Canadian Government is fully aware of it; so how can he come to Canada and ask the Canadian authorities to deal with some fictional 'Sikh extremism'. Fortunately, the Canadian justice system is much better than India's. I feel it's absurd for him make those demands. Clean your house first before you start accusing others ... Remember, justice delayed is justice denied.

6: Sangat Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), June 28, 2010, 8:21 PM.

I.J. Singh's comments are more balanced. Going by other majority consensus it would appear that it was expected of a BJP or, what Mughals did in the past, to lean more towards their own coreligionists at the expense of others. Remember Morarji Desi when the Akalis went to see him for some discussion, took with them some Parshad, which he flatly refused to accept, saying: "I don't eat 'halva' ". When told that it was the holy parshad, this arrogant Gandhian said: "Then rub it on my head". PM Manmohan Singh is universally loved for his ability, honesty, humility and integrity. He would remain matchless on all counts as 'Sardar - a King'. Let's allow him do his job. He is trying his best to follow the Sikh teachings. You will never easily get a man like him. Or, would you rather have a 'Badal' or a 'Sarna'? "Sabhe sajhival sada-in tun kisai na diseh bahra jio" [GGS 97.8] "All share in Your Grace, none are beyond you".

7: Raj Kumar Gupta (Ambala, Haryana, India), June 28, 2010, 9:19 PM.

And ... Morarji Desai was the same idiot we had for Prime Minister who proudly admitted, while he was PM, to the Time Magazine reporter - who then promptly quoted him verbatim in their next issue - that he was a good Hindu and as such drank a glass-full of his own urine every day! It made me hang my head in shame that day to be a Hindu and an Indian, I remember. Manmohan Singh has restored my pride in being an Indian.

8: Raj (Canada), June 28, 2010, 11:58 PM.

I don't think there's anyone who dares question his scholarship and integrity. In addressing Sikh issues, he's no better than the ignorant Giani Zail Singh. He spoke mostly nonsense when it came to defending Sikh causes. Both these fellows were present in Delhi in those days of carnage, and yet didn't dare to speak the truth.

9: Bikramjit Singh (London, United Kingdom), June 29, 2010, 3:28 AM.

Manmohan Singh is a typical Indian politician. To think that just because he is a Sikh, that he will have any great sympathy for his own community is a mistake. Any person who can with good conscience remain a member of a political party that murdered 10,000 of his own community in broad daylight cannot be considered honest or a man of integrity. Telling a bare-faced lie about how his government has handled the non-prosecution of the murderers of the Sikhs also shown his dishonesty. Honesty and integrity are not judged according to the issues involved. A man is honest or has integrity, period. A thief cannot be said to be honest because some of the time he actually pays for the items he buys. Manmohan Singh cannot be called a man of integrity because he only lies about the killings of 1984 but on all other issues he is open and honest. Unless the Sikhs hold Manmohan Singh to the same standard as we hold our politicians in the West, then Manmohan Singh will continue to make fools of us all.

10: Dr. Birinder Singh Ahluwalia (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), June 29, 2010, 7:57 AM.

As much as I commend Canada, it's democratic institutions and it's polity (as evidenced by recent Justice Major's report on the Flight 182 saga and PM Stephen Harper embracing the correct path of offering the long due apology and compensation to victims) for being fearless and full of integrity for blaming themselves and none else in aiding and abetting (one way or the other) in the commission of such a heinous crime(s) - the bombing of Flight 1982 - I believe it is time for the esteemed PM of India, Dr.Manmohan Singh, to show some leadership in charting a course to get justice for all minorities living in India (including the beloved and brave Sikhs) who have been eternal victims of state-sponsored terrorism. I hope during the G8/G20 summits, some of the great leadership of Canada, Canadians and our PM may have rubbed off on PM Singh and his Indian delegation - and I say this most respectfully.

11: Irvinder Singh Babra (Brampton, Ontario, Canada), June 29, 2010, 8:41 AM.

Let Dr. Manmohan Singh, who will invariably be leaving politics in the very near future, and others know that the Sikhs in Canada are freed from any stigmas relating to the bombing the Air India plane, by the two renowned Justices, Ian Josephson in Vancouver in 2005, and John Major in Toronto, this month. Anyone blaming the Sikhs henceforth is merely doing it through pure mischief or absolute ignorance.

12: Jagpal Singh Tiwana (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), June 29, 2010, 1:28 PM.

Manmohan Singh is a Congress man. He is implementing the policies of his party. He is doing what was and is expected from him. I never expected that he would take up Sikh issues and neither did he make any promises on any such issues. His contribution to expose Sikhism to the world is greater than any parcharak or jathedar has done. Now the whole world knows that a turbaned man can be a non-Muslim. Our parcharaks only preach in the gurdwaras; pictures of turnanned Manmohan Singh have appeared in the media in every country in the world. In 2005, he apologized about the 1984 Delhi pogroms. He also announced some compensation to the victims. It was not much though, yet still, it should be recognized that he did take baby steps. Delhi Sikhs who suffered most have accepted his apologies. They voted for the Congress govt. in Delhi. DSGMC is controlled and managed by Congressi Sikhs. Diaspora Sikhs should not make things difficult for Delhi Sikhs. If they want to be friendly with the majority community, we should accept their decision. A couple of friends have blamed the BJP and all Hindus for being hostile to Sikhs. Let me be the devil's advocate. Sikhs are not ungrateful. BJP and RSS workers saved many Sikh neighbours in 1984. The BJP govt. set up the Nanavati Commission when the Mishra Commission failed to do justice. Maken, Dharam Das, Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, Bhagat - all the criminal leaders were Congress leaders. No BJP leader was a target of the Sikhs. PM Atal Bihari allocated 300 crores for Anandpur Sahib during the 1999 Khalsa birthday celebrations. The CM of Delhi, M.L. Khurana was a great friend of the Sikhs. We should not blame all Hindus.

13: Taran (London, United Kingdom), June 29, 2010, 5:30 PM.

What a shame Manmohan Singh is! In fact he is no different from the Badals or Sarnas. What if the same comments had been made by a Hindu PM? We would have totally rubbished his/ her remarks on the blatant lies. Just because Manmohan Singh is wearing a turban, does it mean we are going to keep on prouding ourselves? He is no different than the Sajjan Kumars or Jagdish Tytlers. India needs to address issues of minorities, human rights abuses, etc. He is the premier of India and obviously he would go to any length to deny all these charges. Even if it means that he has to compromise his conscience or may be he doesn't have one!

14: Taran  (London, U.K.), June 29, 2010, 5:49 PM.

I strongly disagree with S. Sangat Singh ji and S. Jagpal Singh ji. BJP is the same party which carried out the Gujarat pogroms. Also, recently they did it in Orissa. I have no liking for any of the political parties in India but yes, these parties might have odd members who are less criminal than some others, or appear to say or do the right thing at times when it is politically expedient to do so. And, you know what! Manmohan Singh's hoopla over the so-called 'Sikh extremism' in Canada is actually for a reason. And the reason is that all you educated and well-voiced Sikhs are a threat to India. Because you guys can challenge the corrupt and biased Govt. of India through legal, political and media channels. It just happened to one of the Indian criminal-leaders, Kamal Nath. Each time an Indian leader touches the shore of North America, you guys are vigilant and if he/she has a criminal record, you guys make sure that he/she is brought face to face with their past justice. This is what irks the Indian establishment. This is what makes you 'extremist' in India's eyes. They are right - There IS 'extremism' in Canada! Thank God!

15: Kanwarjet Singh (Franklin Park, New Jersey, U.S.A.), June 29, 2010, 11:22 PM.

I believe myself to be one who tries to understand both sides of the story. However I have frustatingly gone from being a Manmohan Singh admirer to a critic. He may have apologized to the Sikhs but that was about the end of it. It took Jarnail SIngh to remind the Congress not to give a ticket to Tytler and Sajjan Kumar - Manmohan Singh was "chup". He could have walked away stating that he stood for his principles. He could have taken care of the compensation program for 1984 victims which he neglected. He could have come out and said "Sikhs, forget about getting justice - you are not entitled to it in the Indian Consitution, so forgive and move on" ... instead, he chose to just say "move on". Dr. Singh, we have moved on - if we would have been like Islamic fundamentalists, India would have been devastated by now. Sikhs have the biggest hearts - perhaps you never realized that. Dr. Singh, try saying 'move on' to our new found friends, the USA, on Sept 11, or to the Bhopal victims or to the 2002 Gujarat victims - you know, you wouldn't dare to do that since it would blow up in your face. Is there terrorism in Canada?? This is a billion dollar question - to answer this, we must look at the past. June 1984 - justice delivered, Oct 1984 - how: we all know. Nov 1984 - justice delivered - still waiting 26 years later. One man's activist is another man's terrorist. If there are terrorist Sikhs, what would you say about your own government, Dr. Singh? What about terrorising innocents from Punjab, J.K., Assam, Manipur who have been rotting in Indian jails for decades without a trial (some even minors)? These people were picked up during the era of people like K.P.S. Gill - criteria for being jailed was 1) K.P.S. Gill and Punjab Police cronies did not like them; 2) they could not pay the Punjab Police; and 3) people paid Punjab Police to settle their personal disputes. How many of these are really terrorists? Think about it - because a terrorist is not born but is created by circumstances almost all inflamed by injustice. What about the terrorists from the Govt. of India who staged the Kanishka bombing, bomb attacks in India and attributed them to 'dushmani takat' from cross the border. If you so fear terrorism, how come movies like 'Rang de Basanti' and 'Gangajal' get accolades. Dr. Singh, this is how a revolution starts. Even Bhagat Singh was called a terrorist by the British. Wake up, Dr. Singh - wake up to the world of reality.

16: Ajay Singh (Rockville, U.S.A.), June 30, 2010, 4:21 PM.

I think overall his tenure as leader of India has a very positive impact for Sikhs, so far, but I will hold off crowning him king till the end of his tenure, at least. However, his duty is not primarily in the economic field of India but also judicial. We refer to 1984 as primarily a Sikh issue but I think it is primarily an INDIAN issue and an important one, as far as justice goes. Similarly, 2002 is not primarily a Muslim issue but an INDIAN issue. I have no hesitation in calling him a failure as a politician since he has been unable to steer the country from a divide-and-rule policy of the Raj era to a united, just and fair governed country. In that respect, how is his legacy going to be different from that of Indira Gandhi's after the 1971 War? She saved India, made it self-reliant and strong. Maybe he'll get a few more airports named after him than she has but in the end, the stats speak for themselves. There are still as high a percentage of the poor and starving as during the 'gareebee hatao' days, corruption just as rampant, languishing institutions, crumbling infrastructure, unemployment, a corrupt bureaucracy, and a mercenary juduciary. Justice is not relevant in the case of murders and genocide only, it is also relevant in safeguarding property, wealth and economic interests of individuals and corporations. I think the Indian Fat Cats are laughing at him since he makes no illegal money but at the same time is not doing anything to stop them either, so they let him sit on a moral high chair while they devour everything in sight.

17: Plate (U.S.A.), June 30, 2010, 7:44 PM.

I agree with and like the way Kanwarjeet Singh has expressed his frustration and disappointment with Manmohan Singh and criticized him in a civilized manner. The Indian PM deserves credit (economics) where it is due and criticism (justice, 1984 pogroms) where it is due as well. I agree with this sentence in particular: "Dr. Singh, we have moved on - if we would have been like Islamic fundamentalists, India would have been devastated by now. Sikhs have the biggest hearts - perhaps you never realized that." This is the reason sikhchic.com is getting popular as a forum with each day. First rate journalism focused on truth and presenting both sides of the coin, yet in a civilized and non-violent manner. Way to go. Does sikhchic have a TV channel in the works? If yes, I have my checkbook ready. [Editor: We'll work on your suggestion. But, in the meantime, we can still use your help for sikhchic.com itself. Please go to the large red circle on the homepage ...]

18: Irvinder Singh Babra (Brampton, Ontario, Canada), July 01, 2010, 7:46 PM.

To Kanwarjit's question that is there terrorism in Canada? The answer is NO, and I fully agree with his comments. India's success is not fully due to Dr. Manmohan Singh's economics or his government's dishonest anti-Sikh-Canadian stand; he is fed Indian intelligence propaganda, all of which has already been rejected by two reputable Canadian Justices, Ian Josephson and John Major, who portrayed the truth in their judgments and freed the Sikhs in Canada of any lingering stigma. Let these two Canadian documents become the standard of reference for Dr. Singh before he opens his mouth on the subject again.

19: Kartar Singh Bhalla (New Delhi, India), July 02, 2010, 3:09 AM.

As Sardar Sangat Singh has stated, Dr I J Singh's description of Dr. Manmohan Singh is balanced and I would agree with his concluding remarks - "So celebrate him in some matters, villify him in others - reminding him of what is expected of him. And don't forget what remains to be done." Sardar Jagpal Singh Tiwana's treatment of the subject is also balanced and comprehensive. He has rightly praised Manmohan Singh when he says that "His contribution to expose Sikhism to the world is greater than any parcharak or jathedar has done." Though, as Sardar Tiwana has stated, it was not much that Manmohan Singh did but still it should be recognized that he did take 'baby steps' to right the wrongs done to Sikhs. His statement that some BJP and RSS workers saved many Sikh neighbours in 1984 is correct as my family and I saw it first-hand.

20: N. Singh (Canada), July 06, 2010, 2:25 AM.

With all due respect, it is interesting to note that all those who think highly of Manmohan Singh in this post, if I was to hazard a guess, would be of the 'older' generation and educated outside of the western education and cultural system. Their interpretations and moral standards are reflective of that way of thinking ... just a point worth noting and perhaps discussing. Are you dealing with a generational and cultural problem here? And how much of that thinking has lead to the problems currently faced by Sikhs today?

21: Mohan Singh (Toronto, Ontario, Canada.), July 06, 2010, 11:40 AM.

There are plenty of problems currently faced by Sikhs in India and especially in Punjab. Either people do not know or do not understand. Gurbani says 'Jis tan lagay soi jane' - there are thousands of Sikhs of all ages in jail since 1984, without any crime, without any trial or hearing. Widows of '84 still await justice and compensation; fear and trauma, drug addictions of Sikh youth in Punjab, diversion of Punjab's water to other states, education, akhoti saadh, deras and many more issues! Even our leaders have no concern for all this. The next census will certainly have a few surprises for us all.

22: Jagpal Singh Tiwana (Surrey, British Columbia, Canada), July 07, 2010, 2:05 PM.

This is in reference to S. Irvinder Singh Babra's message that Judge Major freed Sikhs in Canada from the stigma of terrorist activities. Please read his reply to a question: Q: Do you think some attempt should be made, when potential immigrants are screened, to ensure they won't bring these grievances and use Canada as a place to fight foreign wars? A: I think that is crucial. When an immigrant decides to come to Canada he should accept Canada as it is and leave his fights at home, otherwise stay at home. The difficulty is, our immigration system is badly broken, and if somebody gets his foot on Canadian soil he is immediately covered by the Charter of Rights. You know, this is a very liberal, free-speaking country, and I don't think there's any question that the Charter - which I would still take, warts and all - does make it easier.

Comment on "Manmohan Singh:
The Sardar is King at G20 Summit"









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.