Books
Gandhi: Naked Ambition
by JAD ADAMS
Hiding behind a facade of piety and Hindu practices, Mohandas Gandhi - the "Father of India" and one of Hinduism's latest crop of gods and godesses - practiced bizarre sexual perversions. They have mostly been covered-up to date by his victims, family, colleagues, Hindu fundamentalists and Indian politicians alike, for the express purpose of protecting his 'saintly' image which was so deftly nurtured and fictionalized by Richard Attenborough in his Hollywood take on the man. A new book reveals a plethora of troubling facts.
GANDHI: NAKED AMBITION, by Jad Adams. Quercus, 2010. 20 Pounds Sterling.
It was no secret that Mohandas Gandhi had an unusual sex life.
He spoke constantly of sex and gave detailed, often provocative, instructions to his followers as to how to they might best observe chastity. And his views were not always popular.
"Abnormal and unnatural" was how the first Prime Minister of independent India, Jawaharlal Nehru, described Gandhi's advice to newlyweds to stay celibate for the sake of their souls.
But was there something more complex than a pious plea for chastity at play in Gandhi's beliefs, preachings and even his unusual personal practices (which included, alongside his famed chastity, sleeping naked next to nubile, naked women to test his restraint)?
In the course of researching my new book on Gandhi, going through a hundred volumes of his complete works and many tomes of eye-witness material, details became apparent which add up to a more bizarre sexual history.
Much of this material was known during his lifetime, but was distorted or suppressed after his death during the process of elevating Gandhi into the "Father of the Nation". Was the Mahatma, in fact, as the pre-independence prime minister of the Indian state of Travancore called him, "a most dangerous, semi-repressed sex maniac"?
Gandhi was born in the Indian state of Gujarat and married at 13 in 1883; his wife Kasturba was 14, not early by the standards of Gujarat at that time. The young couple had a normal sex life, sharing a bed in a separate room in his family home, and Kasturba was soon pregnant.
Two years later, as his father lay dying, Gandhi left his bedside to have sex with Kasturba. Meanwhile, his father drew his last breath. The young man compounded his grief with guilt that he had not been present, and represented his subsequent revulsion towards "lustful love" as being related to his father's death.
However, Gandhi and Kasturba's last child wasn't born until fifteen years later, in 1900.
In fact, Gandhi did not develop his censorious attitude to sex (and certainly not to marital sex) until he was in his 30s, while a volunteer in the ambulance corps, assisting the British Empire in its wars in Southern Africa. On long marches in sparsely populated land in the Boer War and the Zulu uprisings, Gandhi considered how he could best "give service" to humanity and decided it must be by embracing poverty and chastity.
At the age of 38, in 1906, he took a vow of brahmacharya, which meant living a spiritual life but is normally referred to as chastity, without which such a life is deemed impossible by Hindus.
Gandhi found it easy to embrace poverty. It was chastity that eluded him. So he worked out a series of complex rules which meant he could say he was chaste while still engaging in the most explicit sexual conversation, letters and behaviour.
With the zeal of the convert, within a year of his vow, he told readers of his newspaper Indian Opinion: "It is the duty of every thoughtful Indian not to marry. In case he is helpless in regard to marriage, he should abstain from sexual intercourse with his wife."
Meanwhile, Gandhi was challenging that abstinence in his own way. He set up ashrams in which he began his first "experiments" with sex; boys and girls were to bathe and sleep together, chastely, but were punished for any sexual talk. Men and women were segregated, and Gandhi's advice was that husbands should not be alone with their wives, and, when they felt passion, should take a cold bath.
The rules did not, however, apply to him.
Sushila Nayar, the attractive sister of Gandhi's secretary, also his personal physician, attended Gandhi from girlhood. She used to sleep and bathe with Gandhi. When challenged, he explained how he ensured decency was not offended. "While she is bathing I keep my eyes tightly shut," he said, "I do not know ... whether she bathes naked or with her underwear on. I can tell from the sound that she uses soap." The provision of such personal services to Gandhi was a much sought-after sign of his favour and aroused jealousy among the ashram inmates.
[Post-independence, Sushila Nayar - like all Congress-wallas - was rewarded for her services. She became India's Health Minister under Jawaharlal Nehru!]
As he grew older (and following Kasturba's death) Gandhi was to have more women around him and would oblige women to sleep with him whom - according to his segregated ashram rules - were forbidden to sleep with their own husbands. Gandhi would have women in his bed, engaging in his "experiments" which seem to have been, from a reading of his letters, an exercise in strip-tease or other non-contact sexual activity.
Much explicit material has been destroyed but tantalising remarks in Gandhi's letters remain such as: "Vina's sleeping with me might be called an accident. All that can be said is that she slept close to me." One might assume, then, that getting into the spirit of the Gandhian experiment meant something more than just sleeping close to him.
It can't, one imagines, have helped with the "involuntary discharges" which Gandhi complained of experiencing more frequently since his return to India. He had an almost magical belief in the power of semen: "One who conserves his vital fluid acquires unfailing power," he said.
Meanwhile, it seemed that challenging times required greater efforts of spiritual fortitude, and for that, more attractive women were required: Sushila, who in 1947 was 33, was now due to be supplanted in the bed of the 77-year-old Gandhi by a woman almost half her age. While in Bengal to see what comfort he could offer in times of inter-communal violence in the run-up to independence, Gandhi called for his 18-year-old grandniece Manu to join him - and sleep with him.
"We both may be killed by the Muslims," he told her, "and must put our purity to the ultimate test, so that we know that we are offering the purest of sacrifices, and we should now both start sleeping naked."
Such behaviour was no part of the accepted practice of bramacharya. He, by now, described his reinvented concept of a brahmachari as: "One who never has any lustful intention, who, by constant attendance upon God, has become proof against conscious or unconscious emissions, who is capable of lying naked with naked women, however beautiful, without being in any manner whatsoever sexually excited ... who is making daily and steady progress towards God and whose every act is done in pursuance of that end and no other."
That is, he could do whatever he wished, so long as there was no apparent "lustful intention". He had effectively redefined the concept of chastity to fit his personal practices.
Thus far, his reasoning was spiritual, but in the maelstrom that was India approaching independence he took it upon himself to see his sex experiments as having national importance: "I hold that true service of the country demands this observance," he stated.
But while he was becoming bolder in his self-righteousness, Gandhi's behaviour was widely discussed and criticised by family members and leading politicians.
Some members of his staff resigned, including two editors of his newspaper who left after refusing to print parts of Gandhi's sermons dealing with his sleeping arrangements.
But Gandhi found a way of regarding the objections as a further reason to continue. "If I don't let Manu sleep with me, though I regard it as essential that she should," he announced, "wouldn't that be a sign of weakness in me?"
Eighteen-year-old Abha, the wife of Gandhi's grandnephew Kanu Gandhi, rejoined Gandhi's entourage in the run-up to independence in 1947 and by the end of August he was sleeping with both Manu and Abha at the same time.
When he was assassinated in January 1948, it was with Manu and Abha by his side. Despite her having been his constant companion in his last years, family members, tellingly, removed Manu from the scene.
Gandhi had written to his son: "I have asked her to write about her sharing the bed with me," but the protectors of his image were eager to eliminate this element of the great leader's life. Devdas, Gandhi's son, accompanied Manu to Delhi station where he took the opportunity of instructing her to keep quiet.
Questioned in the 1970s, Sushila revealingly placed the elevation of this lifestyle to a brahmacharya experiment was a response to criticism of this behaviour. "Later on, when people started asking questions about his physical contact with women - with Manu, with Abha, with me - the idea of brahmacharya experiments was developed ... in the early days, there was no question of calling this a brahmacharya experiment."
It seems that Gandhi lived as he wished, and only when challenged did he turn his own preferences into a cosmic system of rewards and benefits. Like many great men, Gandhi made up the rules as he went along.
While it was commonly discussed as damaging his reputation when he was alive, Gandhi's sexual behaviour was ignored for a long time after his death. It is only now that we can piece together information for a rounded picture of Gandhi's excessive self-belief in the power of his own sexuality. Tragically for him, he was already being sidelined by the politicians at the time of independence.
The preservation of his vital fluid did not keep India intact, and it was the power-brokers of the Congress Party who negotiated the terms of India's freedom.
[Courtesy: The Independent]
April 20, 2010
Conversation about this article
1: Jasbir Singh (Lucknow, India), April 20, 2010, 10:32 AM.
A dirty old man - as the Father of an obscenely corrupt nation: how appropriate! Some bapu! And a witch - also named Gandhi - is now their Mother! God must have a sense of humour.
2: N. Singh (Canada), April 20, 2010, 10:44 AM.
This is in line with what the article, "How Much Inequality Can A 'Democracy' Sustain?" argues ... as India grows in stature, she will no longer be able to keep her dirty little secrets hidden from world view! The whole world will know about the filth that lies beneath the veneer of Indian 'democracy' ... a welcome honest and refreshing piece of work. I will definitely buy the book!
3: Sangat Singh (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), April 20, 2010, 10:50 AM.
On another aspect of Gandhi's life was his feigned 'poverty'. Sarojini Naidu was a great wit and one said: "Do you know, Bapu, how much it costs us to keep you in poverty?"
4: G. Singh (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), April 20, 2010, 11:52 AM.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Furthermore, he had a fascination with bowel movements: he would daily perform enemas on the "sisters". Penn & Teller break down the Gandhi myth in a jaw-droping 6-minute short-doc. Youtube should have the clip but the powers that be keep taking it down. Definitely an AA rating.
5: Gur Singh (Boston, U.S.A..), April 20, 2010, 5:59 PM.
The real Father of the Nation of India is Guru Gobind Singh, who was the delivered the final of the teachings of Nanak and taught Indians to live with dignity. Not surprisingly, Indians are kept ignorant of this fact by their own rulers so that they can rule instead of delivering governance to the common Indian.
6: K. Kaur (Canada), April 20, 2010, 6:22 PM.
What Gandhi was doing to both Manu and Abha would today be termed 'sexual abuse' ... he was mentally and sexually exploiting both these vulnerable young girls who were barely 18 years old and more than 50 years his junior!
7: N. Singh (Canada), April 20, 2010, 7:18 PM.
Currently I am reading 'Indian Summer' by A. Von Tunzelmann which is no doubt pro-Gandhi and yet there are some telling paragraphs in it. E.g. - "There are ample grounds for thinking that a more earthly campaign led by a united Congress, perhaps under the joint leadership of Motilal Nehru and Mohammed Ali Jinnah, could have brought dominion status to India in the 1920's ..." Also, Ambedkar's views on Gandhi are worth noting. Regarding Gandhi's fasting, he says: "there was nothing noble in the fast ... it was a foul and filthy act ... not for the benefit of the Untouchables ... it was a vile and wicked act". My only lament is that Master Tara Singh failed us and I wonder if he is turning in his 'grave' regarding the events of 1984 and beyond ... sometimes I wish he had lived to witness them.
8: Dr. Birinder Singh Ahluwalia (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), April 21, 2010, 7:47 AM.
Despite all the controversy surrounding "Gandhi", I would still credit him for organizing the largest and most effective peaceful/ non-violent freedom movement in human history which, later, inspired the likes of Martin Luther King, Jr. to organize and launch the civil rights movement. However, I am amused by his comments - "I kept my eyes shut while bathing alongside a young girl" - as it reminds me of this famous political quote/ comment by another great leader of the free world explaining his actions - "I smoked it (marijuana) but never inhaled it". To be deemed Father of a Nation ... I think jury is still out. It is too early to conclude who would be deemed Father of this nascent nation (63 yrs post independence and still attempting to identify it's place in world order - developed or semi-developed or developing or emerging etc..) - names that come to mind to fit this category, "Pandit Nehru", "Gandhi" or Dr.Manmohan Singh ... history will be the judge as the destiny of that nation unfolds. As for the comment by someone that Guru Gobind is the Father of India, I beg to differ ... Our Gurus are more than mere heroes or leaders or the mere Fathers of any given nation. They are divine and belong to all humanity!
9: Gurjender Singh (Maryland, U.S.A.), April 21, 2010, 8:24 AM.
Gandhi became famous due to the media and newspapers controlled by Hindus politicians. Now a little openness is allowing these truths to come out. One can see the results of the power of the media in the case of the 1984 Sikh Holocaust, as wielded by the Indian government and politicians, denying it ever happened. At that time, the media was not allowed to send live reports out of India about the worst human right violations in living memory.
10: J. Singh (U.S.A.), April 21, 2010, 10:41 AM.
Dr. Birinder Singh ji: I think the comment and assertions about the 'largest non-violent movement' is incorrect. India has never seen as much bloodshed as during the 1920-40's, if you take into account the lives of freedom fighters (mostly Sikh), WWII soldiers (mostly Sikh) and victims of Partition (mostly Sikh and Punjabi) which were all lost due to Gandhi's incompetence and so-called non-violent movement. India would have tasted freedom in the 1920's (soon after Jallianwalla Bagh) if Gandhi had not betrayed the Congress Party and Indians by wanting to gain independence by making Indians 'worthy' of it in the eyes of the British and therefore sabotaging the exercise.
11: Roopinder Singh Bains (Surrey, British Columbia, Canada), April 21, 2010, 4:11 PM.
In terms of the non-violence movement, Gandhi learnt a lot from the Sikh Religion. Guru Arjan was the first to show the world passive resistance. Baba Ram Singh told his followers to wear home-spun and use their own mail service 40 years before the Congress party adopted the concept of khaddar/ home-spun clothing as a national strategy.
12: Kartar Singh Bhalla (New Delhi, India), April 22, 2010, 12:29 AM.
I admire Dr. Birinder Singh Ahluwalia (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for his cool, balanced and mature write-up on the review.
13: N. Singh (Canada), April 22, 2010, 10:31 AM.
Here are further extracts to note. Regarding Gandhi's non-violent philosophy, the author writes: "He did not believe that women should resist rape, but preferred that they should 'defeat' their assailants by remaining passive and silent" ... try telling that to the women's movement in the West and see what they say about "bapu"! Regarding Hilter: "I do not consider Herr Hitler to be as bad as he is depicted ... he is showing an ability that is amazing" and that future Germans "will honour Herr Hitler as a genius, a brave man, a matchless organizer and much more" ... perhaps not a 'cool, balanced and a mature write-up" according to Kartar Singh Bhalla's standards but that is what is written in the pro-Gandhi book ... one only needs to know what to look for because the truth will not stay hidden for long!
14: Surinder (Massachusetts, U.S.A.), April 22, 2010, 11:29 AM.
The Kooka or Namdhari movement within the Sikh community should have been called the first non-violent movement, and Gandhi's movement should have been called a derivative of that. But post-Independence India has elevated Gandhi to a cult figure to the exclusion of others, mainly to keep themselves in power. The Congress technique has succeeded, and it is still ruling India.
15: Chitra Singh (India), April 28, 2010, 3:06 AM.
He is truly "Father of Nation" ... sleeping with all the women of the country certainly makes him the father of nation!
16: Munir Ahmed (Dhaka, Bangladesh), April 30, 2010, 8:18 PM.
Is that the venerable 'Bapu ji'? Hard to believe! The blind Indians won't allow its entry into India. This type of information would allure Indian youth. I really feel pity on M.K. Gandhi's amorous mischief in the guise of pretensions to be a saint.
17: Anis U Monzur (Dhaka, Bangladesh), May 02, 2010, 2:18 PM.
Gandhi lived in Noakhali District in Bangladesh for sometime where he is believed to have sucked milk of goats and enjoyed young girls he had fetched all the way from Gujarat. These things are being brought to light scores of years after the disappearance of this ostensible cleric who was no less lecher than anybody can imagine, who optimized his vision as a believer in free sex.
18: Umana Anjalin (Dhaka, Bangladesh), May 08, 2010, 9:04 PM.
Unbelievable account about one who has been held in the highest possible esteem in our country for over a century. If the current information is true, the Government of India should do something, either endorse the facts or prove them wrong. The more eloquent the Government is, the more beneficial it would be for the Indian youth.
19: Vincent Mwape (Blantyre, Malawi), May 09, 2010, 12:08 AM.
He was in Africa for quite sometime. A man like him had indulged in perverted sexual crimes in Africa and elsewhere ... hard to believe after all we've been told about him. There should be a thorough inquiry as to who were the victims, especially the innocent girls of Africa.
20: Alok Chakravarty (Kolkata, India), May 09, 2010, 2:58 AM.
During our childhood, we heard he was a saint; during our youth, we were told he was an icon of purity; during our middle age, we were taught that Mohandas was the only infallible, impeccable person in world history. Now, before we return to heaven, we discover that he was a sexual pervert of the highest order!