Kids Corner

Current Events

Billy Graham Was On The Wrong Side of History







Billy Graham
Nov 7, 1918 - Feb 21, 2018


When Billy Graham stands before the judgment seat of God, he may finally realize how badly he failed his country, and perhaps his God. On civil rights and the environmental crisis, the most important issues of his lifetime, he championed the wrong policies.

Graham was on the wrong side of history.

The world’s most famous evangelist let his apocalyptic anticipation of the coming kingdom of God blind him to the realities of living in this world.

For Graham, the Christian Bible had a clear message for Christians living in what he believed were humans’ last days on earth. Individuals alone can achieve salvation; governments cannot. Conversions change behaviors; federal policies do not.

These convictions shaped the evangelist’s views on civil rights.

In the late 1950s, Graham integrated his revivals and seemed to support the burgeoning civil rights movement. This is the Graham most Americans remember.

But as the movement grew, expanded and became increasingly confrontational, the evangelist’s position changed.

Once leaders like Martin Luther King Jr began practicing civil disobedience and asking for the federal government to guarantee African Americans’ rights, Graham’s support evaporated.

Within days of the publication of King’s famous 1963 Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Graham told reporters that the Baptist minister should “put the brakes on a little bit”.

He criticized civil rights activists for focusing on changing laws rather than hearts.

In 1971, Graham published ‘The Jesus Generation‘, a book on the coming apocalypse. Looking for signs of Jesus’s second coming had become an obsession of Graham’s, as it was for millions of other evangelicals in the mid-20th century.

In the book, Graham praised the wisdom of young people who rejected the federal government as a tool for rectifying injustices.

“These young people don’t put much stock in the old slogans of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the New Frontier and the Great Society,” he said. “They believe that utopia will arrive only when Jesus returns. Thus these young people are on sound Biblical ground.”

For six decades, Graham taught Americans that the federal government could not be an instrument of God to bring about justice, not on race matters and not on other significant issues. Although he believed in racial equality, his theology blinded him to what we now know was the best means for achieving that equality.

More recently, the evangelist denied the threat of global warming and rejected federal efforts to stymie it.

In a 1992 book focused on the signs that the world was nearing its end, the preacher suggested that if humankind were going to survive, businesses needed to reduce pollution and stop contributing to global warming.

In a revised 2010 version of the book, Graham eliminated the phrase “global warming” from the text altogether. Global warming no longer existed in the mind of Graham as a real threat.

He went on to assure readers that the earth would not “be saved through legislation”. The federal government, he indicated, had no business passing laws to protect the earth for future generations.

Graham’s positions on civil rights and the environment are not those of a rightwing crank, or of a paranoid anti-intellectual. Graham takes his Christian Bible and his theology seriously. The political positions he has embraced derive from a careful and serious study of the scriptures.

Graham came of age during Franklin Roosevelt’s vast expansion of government power. But rather than join with social gospel advocates like Roosevelt’s aide Harry Hopkins in promoting the creation of a welfare state to serve the needy, the future evangelist was more influenced by apocalypse-obsessed, fundamentalist rabble rousers who rejected New Deal liberalism.

Graham, like most fundamentalists of his generation, determined that the New Deal state represented godless competition for the churches rather than a potential ally.

This is a message that appeared again and again in Graham’s many books on Jesus’s second coming. Only the return of Jesus would right social wrongs, he concluded.

The expansion of state power, in contrast, was a necessary precursor to the rise of the antichrist. The evangelist felt sure that as we approached the end of time, the world’s governments were going to take away Christians’ rights and liberties.

The New Deal, with its intrusive regulations, was the first step; Obamacare, with its contraception mandates, the most recent.

Yet Graham insisted that the inevitability of the second coming was no justification for indifference. “We must not feel that we are to sit back and do nothing to fight evil just because some day the four horsemen will come with full and final force upon the earth,” Graham wrote. Instead, he prodded evangelicals to elect people to office who shared his anti-statist worldview.

They did. White evangelicals have played an outsized role in recent political campaigns, supporting every Republican presidential candidate from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump.

Graham had the opportunity to lead fundamentalists into a new era. He could have pushed them to take social reform seriously as a God-given mandate to save the world from environmental destruction. He could have tackled racism, America’s original sin, by championing the federal government’s aggressive civil rights policies.

But he squandered it. He could not overcome the speculative end-times schemes of his cohort of evangelicals, with their anti-government hostilities.

Graham had good intentions, as his work desegregating his crusades demonstrated. But when his influence really would have counted, when he could have effected real change, real social transformation, he was too locked into last-days fearmongering to recognize the potential of the state to do good. We are all paying the price.

A different kind of last days may soon be upon us. Racial tensions are rising, the earth is warming, and evangelicals are doing little to help. That may be Graham’s most significant, and saddest, legacy.

The author is a Guggenheim Fellow and the author of ‘American Apocalypse: A History of Modern Evangelicalism‘. He is the Edward R Meyer Professor of History at Washington State University.

[Courtesy: The Guardian]

February 27, 2018

Conversation about this article

1: Arjan Singh (USA), March 02, 2018, 10:07 PM.

Very balanced and informative article. While I do not have full knowledge of Billy Graham's sermons or theology, it is clear that faith in theology must be balanced with some level of scientific reasoning. Why would a preacher or a theologian not discuss the impact of our modern economy on the environment? Why would he/she not discuss the abuse of children? American economy was built on slave labor. That is a proven fact from history. Why would the preachers and the Federal Government not promote civil rights?

2: Fatehpal Singh Tarney (Boca Raton, Florida, USA), March 05, 2018, 4:38 PM.

This is an insightful and accurate essay. The evangelical view is that government should be limited if, and only if it is inconsistent with their fundamentalist beliefs. Otherwise, government can have virtually unlimited power! Billy Graham did an about=face on global warming and his concern for the poor, racial minorities, and the downtrodden was quite limited and inconsistent. Sadly, his son, Franklin Graham, is far worse. His bigoted comments on Islam have been outrageous, vicious and counterproductive. He has said that he was never sure if Barack Obama was a true Christian because he has a Muslim father and has made very troubling statements about race and the LGBT community. Franklin Graham is correctly seen as one of the leaders who today are using Christianity as a political weapon.

3: Roop Singh (Canada), March 06, 2018, 11:34 AM.

I see a parallel here: evangelicals are no different than the fake baabey of Punjab. Both have used a distorted version of religion to accumulate huge properties and great wealth. They also steer a political message to their millions of followers for the political party that best suits their needs. Follow the money and truth will appear.

4: Arjan Singh (USA), March 06, 2018, 10:45 PM.

#3 Roop ji: I could not have said it better. Let us do introspection as well, and realize that we have many personalities that are far removed from the original message of the Gurus and humanity.

Comment on "Billy Graham Was On The Wrong Side of History"

To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.