Kids Corner

Roundtable

The Right to Die:
Can Canadians Seek Help to Die?
The Roundtable Open Forum # 135

THE CANADIAN PRESS

 

 

 

Ottawa, Canada

Canada's top court will today confront an elemental -- some would say intractable -- question: whether Canadians have the right to seek help to end their own lives.

The Supreme Court of Canada is convening this morning to hear a new challenge to Canada's existing and long-standing ban on physician-assisted suicide.

The court last considered the issue in 1993 when it ruled that where assisted death is concerned, certain rights enshrined in Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms are trumped by the principles of fundamental justice.

Twenty years later, right-to-die advocates say the legal and moral landscape in Canada has changed, and the laws need to change with it.

"The federal government has no place at the bedside of dying Canadians," said Grace Pastine, the litigation director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, on behalf of several B.C. families.

The organization launched what's become known as the 'right to die with dignity' lawsuit in 2011 after B.C.'s Gloria Taylor set about ending her life following a diagnosis of Lou Gehrig's disease.

In June 2012, the B.C. Supreme Court agreed that existing laws did deny Taylor the right to control her own life, and gave the court a year to write new ones. At the same time, they gave her an exemption so she could get help ending her own life.

Taylor died before that could happen and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.

The argument that assisted suicide prohibitions violate the Charter rests on two sections: Section 7, which sets out the right to life, liberty and security of the person, and Section 15, which grants equality rights.

It's an argument that has been tried before -- in 1993 the Supreme Court was asked by Sue Rodriguez whether existing laws violated her charter rights.

Rodriguez also had Lou Gehrig's disease, formally known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS, and wished to end her life, famously saying, "Whose body is this? Who owns my life?"

In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that while the laws did violate her rights, they were overridden by the principles of fundamental justice.

"Given the concerns about abuse and the great difficulty in creating appropriate safeguards, the blanket prohibition on assisted suicide is not arbitrary or unfair," the court said.

"The prohibition relates to the state's interest in protecting the vulnerable and is reflective of fundamental values at play in our society."

More than 20 years later, the government is arguing that nothing has changed, in spite of the fact that the issue has been debated several times in the Canadian Parliament.

"There is no indication that Parliament's refusal to change the law is the result of an unwillingness to address the issue," the government argues in its factum.

"During the debates, parliamentarians canvassed many, if not all, of the issues raised in the present litigation, including: the adequacy of safeguards; the duty of Parliament to protect human life, especially the lives of vulnerable individuals; the experiences of countries in which assisted suicide has been legalized; and the negative message concerning the value of human life that would be sent to all Canadians if assisted suicide were permitted."

 

THE ROUNDTABLE OPEN FORUM # 135

What is the Sikh perspective on this issue?

Do you agree with the position taken by the Civil Liberties advocates or with the Canadian governments's official stance?

What are your personal thoughts on this dilemma? Has anyone in your family or friends' circle been confronted with such choices? What was the outcome?

 

[Courtesy: The Huffington Post]

October 15, 2014

 

Conversation about this article

1: Pritam Singh (Chandigarh, Punjab), October 15, 2014, 10:01 AM.

I cannot see how Sikhi -- or any other system of compassion and caring -- could endorse the unnecessary prolonging of life when a person is suffering extremely and severely, the doctors have declared that there is no hope of recovery, and he/she is, in a clear state of mind, asking for life to be terminated. When all of the extreme and extraordinary criteria are met, what right do we have as a society to deny that individual relief by imposing a cold set of so-called moral rules, or defer to the wishes of friends and relatives who are trying desperately to cope with their own bereavement?

Comment on "The Right to Die:
Can Canadians Seek Help to Die?
The Roundtable Open Forum # 135 "









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.