Kids Corner

People

Freedom Fighters

by SCOTT SHANE

 

Editor's Note:  Here's a lesson to be learnt in democracy by both India and the Sikhs. If only Amrit and her colleagues will now turn their attention to the torture and extra-judicial killings by Indian government authorities, and the fact that thousands of innocent political prisoners (not 'prisoners of war' or 'enemy combatants', terms that the U.S. tries to hide behind) continue to languish in Indian jails without charge or due process, we'll be doing something truly meaningful.   

 

FREEDOM FIGHTER 

In the spring of 2003, long before Abu Ghraib or secret prisons became part of the American vocabulary, a pair of recently hired lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union noticed a handful of news reports about allegations of abuse of prisoners in American custody.

The lawyers, Amrit Kaur Singh and Jameel Jaffer, wondered: Was there a broader pattern of abuse, and could a Freedom of Information Act request uncover it? Some of their colleagues, more experienced with the frustrations of such document demands, were skeptical. One made a tongue-in-cheek offer of $1 for every page they turned up.

Six years later, the detention document request and subsequent lawsuit are among the most successful in the history of public disclosure, with 130,000 pages of previously secret documents released to date and the prospect of more.

The case has produced revelation after revelation: battles between the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and the military over the treatment of detainees at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp; autopsy reports on prisoners who died in custody in Afghanistan and Iraq; the Justice Department's long-secret memorandums justifying harsh interrogation methods; and day-by-day descriptions of what happened inside the Central Intelligence Agency's overseas prisons.

"This is certainly a landmark case in every respect, including in the history of the Freedom of Information Act," said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists and an expert on the act.

But Mr. Aftergood said the case also illustrated how costly litigation was often necessary to unearth documents the government preferred to protect. "The law gives you standing to fight," he said. "It doesn't guarantee victory."

In fact, the A.C.L.U. and its partners, a New Jersey law firm, Gibbons P.C., and four other advocacy groups, estimate that they have put more than 10,000 hours of legal work into the case. The parties have filed more than 100 motions before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court in Manhattan; appeared for formal court arguments a dozen times; and twice taken disputes to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. And now, for the first time, the government is seeking a hearing before the Supreme Court.

The total costs in lawyers' time and other expenses may exceed $2 million, and under the law, the plaintiffs are entitled to seek reimbursement from the government if they "substantially prevail" in their quest - a standard almost certainly met in this case.

The Freedom of Information Act has a mixed reputation with advocates, journalists and companies who use it regularly. It can be notoriously slow to generate results, and in the case of classified documents - the vast majority of the records at issue in the A.C.L.U. case - the pages often come back with all or most of the content blacked out.

Agencies sometimes do not take a case seriously until the requestor takes the government to court. The A.C.L.U.'s initial October 2003 request for documents on the treatment of prisoners produced a single document - an innocuous set of State Department "talking points" - before the organization filed suit in June 2004, joined by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans for Peace.

Documents began to flow only after September 2004, when Judge Hellerstein issued a ruling criticizing the "glacial pace" of the government's response and added, "If the documents are more of an embarrassment than a secret, the public should know of our government's treatment of individuals captured and held abroad."

Amrit Singh, 40, the daughter of the Indian prime minister, Manmohan Singh, graduated from Yale Law School, is married to an American and holds dual Indian and American citizenship.

Jameel Jaffer, 37, a Canadian-born lawyer who left a lucrative practice with a private firm to join the A.C.L.U., said, "Maybe our inexperience was a good thing, because we actually thought we might get something."

Amrit Singh recalls being teased by a senior colleague in 2003 who asked, " ‘Are you clearing out shelf space for all the documents you'll get?' " The joke backfired, as reams of paper began to arrive. The organization eventually had to create a new computer system to handle the large electronic database, and in 2007 the two lawyers published a book-length collection of the documents obtained by then, called "Administration of Torture."

The largest share of documents (2,814) have come from the Defence Department, the A.C.L.U. said, followed by the State Department (998), the F.B.I. (872), other units in the Justice Department (145) and the C.I.A. (49).

A C.I.A. spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, said the agency "takes very seriously - and devotes considerable resources to meeting - its legal obligations under the Freedom of Information Act" and has released tens of millions of pages of documents over the years.

But the recent C.I.A. disclosures caused deep unease inside the agency. Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the former C.I.A. director, said releasing documents the agency had designated as top secret could undermine crucial cooperation from foreign intelligence services. The decision by President Obama in April to release Justice Department memorandums describing C.I.A. interrogation is leading to a cascade of disclosures, General Hayden said.

Four former C.I.A. directors and the current one, Leon E. Panetta, had all argued unsuccessfully against the release, which had not yet been ordered by the court in the A.C.L.U. case, though the plaintiffs' lawyers said they believed that the release would eventually happen.

"We got publicly rolled," General Hayden said. "So our foreign partners may say there is no value to our promise in the future that ‘Don't worry, we can keep this secret.' "

In May, Mr. Obama decided to fight the release of hundreds of photographs of abuse, saying they could encourage attacks on American troops abroad. It is the photo issue that the administration is taking to the Supreme Court.

The A.C.L.U.'s success has led some news organizations to take a new look at the potential of the Freedom of Information Act to expose government secrets. But the A.C.L.U. lawyers note that their effort has repeatedly fed off the work of investigative reporters who have identified cases of abuse, legal opinions and other documents that the organization then pursued in court.

Their lawsuit continues. The government faces yet another court-imposed deadline to turn over more documents - including the 2001 presidential directive authorizing the secret prisons - or explain why they must be withheld.

 

[Courtesy: The New York Times]

September 19, 2009 

Conversation about this article

1: Gurpal (Wolverhampton, U.K.), September 19, 2009, 4:05 PM.

Looking at the Editor's Note - I think you and the New York Times appear to have completely overlooked or perhaps were unaware, that Amrit Kaur Singh is the youngest daughter of India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Therefore, this is a gem of an article! [Editor: para 12 of the article states this fact. It's still a gem.]

2: Meena (Delhi, India), September 19, 2009, 7:04 PM.

Give me a break! What is a gem? The fact that Amrit Kaur Singh is busy exposing the sins of the U.S. government when her father has been instrumental in hiding the same exact sins committed by the Indian government against the Sikhs! This family really needs to take a long hard look at themselves ... how brave to do this in a country (USA) where your human and civil rights are guaranteed. Wow ... what a hero; freedom fighter indeed!

3: Ravinder Singh (Sydney, Australia), September 19, 2009, 11:53 PM.

What about human rights violations against the Sikhs in Punjab, Delhi and elsewhere? Perhap's Amrit Kaur Singh could investigate and aid in prosecuting the perpetrators, including India's police, Government officials, etc ...

4: G.C. Singh (U.S.A.), September 20, 2009, 12:08 AM.

It is absolute hypocrisy! Why has Amrit never ever spoken about the genocide of tens of thousands of innocent Sikhs in India? Is she scared to speak out because she is well aware of the fate that awaits human rights activists in India, like Jaswant Singh Khalra? He was chairman of the human rights cell of the Shiromani Akali Dal, and had exposed the cases of more than 25,000 Sikhs who were killed in fake encounters after brutal torture and their bodies disposed of as unidentified. Khalra was pressured to change his report and upon his refusal, he was kidnapped from his house by police, savagely tortured and then killed.

5: Raj (Canada), September 20, 2009, 12:28 AM.

Yes Meena Ji, that is ironic. It's easy to point fingers at others when your own three fingers are pointing back at you, but conveniently that fact is brushed aside.

6: Vimaljit Kaur (Singapore), September 20, 2009, 7:40 AM.

With all due respect, I think we should focus on what Amrit has done in the field she has chosen to pursue and not what YOU think she ought to pursue.

7: Gurjender Singh Bedi (Maryland, U.S.A.), September 20, 2009, 1:00 PM.

It'll be great if some people follow Amrit's footsteps in India, because some of the media in India may be open now to reporting things, now that 25 years have gone by and it is safe ...

8: Rani (U.S.A. ), September 20, 2009, 1:49 PM.

Vimaljit - she has chosen to pursue the legal profession and but she has been selective in her pursuit of justice. As a Sikh, Indian and lawyer, she could, at the very least, raise her voice against the violations in Punjab, Gujerat, etc., but she has chosen to not do so. No doubt if she went to India and stopped being Manmohan Singh's daughter for a day, she would get a sense of what it's like to be an minority in India ... a lesson she would not easily forget!

9: Gursharn Singh Nagi (Delhi, India), September 22, 2009, 11:41 AM.

The only real interest Dr. Manmohan Singh and his family share is Congress ... whether it's the American Congress or the Indian one. Need one say more?

10: Kanwarjeet Singh Chadha (Franklin Park, New Jersey, U.S.A.), October 01, 2009, 1:45 PM.

Ok, now frankly what has she done wrong that most of you are mad about? Why are you relating her work to her father's? Especially folks like Meena - ask yourself, is she doing something wrong? If the answer is a 'no', then please stop critcizing. Focus on what she is doing and not what she is not. All others, if you are so concerned about '84, why don't you get out of that chair of yours and do something like H.S. Phoolka, instead of being critical of Amrit's work. Easy to blame others, isn't it - blame it on God, circumstances, or others!

11: Meena (Delhi, India), February 06, 2010, 7:10 PM.

Kanwarjeet Singh ji: she is being a hypocrite ... the disease of privileged Indians. This is a case of the 'pot calling the kettle black'. Also there is a huge divide between people like Amrit Singh and ordinarly people. Amrit Singh has had a privileged life and consequently the onus is on her to provide more and give more to those less fortunate than herself: "To whom much is given, much will be expected". Also I am helping the victims of 1984 and other disasters, so thank you for your advice!

Comment on "Freedom Fighters"









To help us distinguish between comments submitted by individuals and those automatically entered by software robots, please complete the following.

Please note: your email address will not be shown on the site, this is for contact and follow-up purposes only. All information will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Sikhchic reserves the right to edit or remove content at any time.